Serrari Group

India Diversifies Crude Supply with 7 Million Barrel Purchase from Angola, Brazil and UAE as Russian Oil Retreat Accelerates

India’s largest refiner has executed a strategic pivot in its crude oil sourcing strategy, purchasing approximately 7 million barrels of crude for March delivery from suppliers across Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America. This significant transaction by Indian Oil Corporation marks the latest chapter in India’s accelerating shift away from Russian oil supplies, driven by a combination of Western sanctions on Moscow’s energy sector and mounting diplomatic pressure from Washington to reduce dependency on what has been India’s top oil supplier since 2022.

The diversification comes at a critical juncture for New Delhi’s energy security and its broader relationship with the United States, as the two nations negotiate a comprehensive trade agreement that could substantially reduce the 50 percent tariffs currently imposed on Indian exports. The Trump administration has explicitly linked these punitive tariffs to India’s continued purchases of Russian crude, creating powerful economic incentives for Indian refiners to recalibrate their supply chains and demonstrate responsiveness to American concerns.

Build the future you deserve. Get started with our top-tier Online courses: ACCA, HESI A2, ATI TEAS 7, HESI EXIT, NCLEX-RN, NCLEX-PN, and Financial Literacy. Let Serrari Ed guide your path to success. Enroll today.

A Strategic Purchase Spanning Three Continents

Indian Oil Corporation’s latest procurement represents a geographically diverse portfolio designed to replace Russian barrels that have become increasingly problematic from both a sanctions compliance and diplomatic perspective. The refiner purchased 1 million barrels of Abu Dhabi’s Murban grade from Shell and 2 million barrels of Upper Zakum from trader Mercuria, securing substantial Middle Eastern supplies that offer both quality and reliability.

From Angola, sub-Saharan Africa’s second-largest oil producer, IOC acquired 1 million barrels each of Hungo and Clove crude grades from ExxonMobil. Angola currently pumps around 1.1 million barrels per day and remains a key supplier of medium-to-light sweet crude favored by Asian refiners for its high transport fuel yield. The country holds proven oil reserves of approximately 9 billion barrels and has been seeking to stabilize output while attracting new investment to mature offshore fields.

The Angolan grades have particular appeal for Indian refiners. Hungo crude is characterized as medium viscosity and semi-sweet crude with 28.5° API gravity and 0.71 percent sulfur content, produced from oil fields Hungo and Chocalho on Block 15. This quality specification makes it suitable for the complex refining configurations that dominate India’s downstream sector, allowing refiners to maximize yields of high-value products like diesel and gasoline.

Completing the global sourcing strategy, IOC bought 2 million barrels of Brazil’s Buzios oil from Petrobras under an optional contract that provides flexibility to strike deals at mutually agreed terms. This arrangement reflects the growing importance of Latin American crude in India’s diversification strategy, with Brazil emerging as a reliable supplier capable of delivering large volumes of quality crude that can substitute for Russian grades.

The March loading schedule for these cargoes represents forward planning by IOC to ensure supply continuity as Russian volumes decline. Oil buyers and sellers typically maintain confidentiality around such transactions, and pricing details were not immediately available, though market participants suggest the diversified sourcing will likely increase India’s average crude acquisition costs compared to the steep discounts previously available on Russian barrels.

The Russian Oil Context: From Boom to Retreat

India’s relationship with Russian crude has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past four years. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and the subsequent imposition of Western sanctions on Moscow’s energy sector, India emerged as the biggest buyer of discounted Russian seaborne crude, with imports surging from under 1 percent of total crude purchases in 2020 to between 35 and 40 percent by 2025.

This strategic opportunism served India’s economic interests well during a period of elevated global energy prices. Russian crude was available at discounts ranging between $8 and $12 per barrel relative to Middle Eastern benchmarks, helping Indian refiners reduce their overall landing costs, keep domestic fuel prices more stable, and export refined fuel products profitably to various international markets. The arrangement provided India with affordable energy while offering Russia a crucial revenue stream and market access despite Western sanctions.

However, the calculus shifted dramatically in October 2024 when the United States imposed sanctions on Russia’s top oil producers Rosneft and Lukoil, which together accounted for approximately 60 percent of India’s Russian crude imports. These sanctions, which took effect in November 2025, fundamentally altered the risk profile of sourcing from these suppliers, forcing Indian refiners to either find alternative Russian exporters not covered by sanctions or pivot to non-Russian sources entirely.

The impact was swift and measurable. India’s Russian oil imports fell to a two-year low in December, while the share of supplies from OPEC members rose to an 11-month high, demonstrating the speed with which Indian refiners can reorient their sourcing when circumstances demand. By January 2026, Russian crude flows to India had dropped to 1.38 million barrels daily, down 22 percent from November levels, though not as dramatically as some analysts had predicted because some Indian refiners switched from sanctioned to non-sanctioned Russian oil companies.

The US Tariff Pressure Campaign

The decline in Russian imports must be understood within the broader context of escalating trade tensions between Washington and New Delhi. In August 2025, President Trump imposed an additional 25 percent duty on India’s Russian oil purchases on top of existing 25 percent reciprocal tariffs, bringing the cumulative tariff burden on Indian exports to the United States to a staggering 50 percent—among the highest imposed on any major trading partner.

The Trump administration framed these tariffs explicitly as punishment for India’s energy relationship with Russia, with officials arguing that oil revenues constitute a primary funding source for Moscow’s military operations in Ukraine. The president made clear that reducing or eliminating these tariffs would depend on India demonstrating concrete steps to curtail Russian crude imports—creating powerful leverage that has shaped Indian refining decisions ever since.

The economic stakes are substantial. India’s exports to the United States reached $86.51 billion in fiscal year 2025, accounting for the largest share of India’s total export basket. The 50 percent tariff threatens to undermine the competitiveness of Indian manufacturers across multiple sectors, from textiles and pharmaceuticals to information technology services and automotive components. Indian officials have calculated that if compelled to shift away from Russian oil entirely, the country’s annual import bill could rise by approximately $9-11 billion as the country pivots to more expensive Middle Eastern or American crude grades.

The threat escalated further in January 2026 when Senator Lindsey Graham announced that President Trump had “greenlit” a bipartisan bill that would grant the administration authority to impose tariffs of up to 500 percent on imports from countries doing business with Russia’s energy sector. While the legislation had not been enacted at the time of Indian Oil’s recent purchase, the prospect of such punitive measures has clearly influenced strategic planning by Indian energy companies and policymakers.

Recent signals from Washington suggest the pressure campaign may be achieving its intended effect. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated that the administration might reduce the 50 percent tariffs to 15-16 percent, stating that “Indian purchases, by their refineries, of Russian oil have collapsed. That is a success.” This represents a significant potential concession that could restore competitiveness to Indian exporters while maintaining American leverage over New Delhi’s energy policy.

One decision can change your entire career. Take that step with our Online courses in ACCA, HESI A2, ATI TEAS 7, HESI EXIT, NCLEX-RN, NCLEX-PN, and Financial Literacy. Join Serrari Ed and start building your brighter future today.

Building Alternative Supply Relationships

Indian Oil Corporation’s diversification extends beyond the March purchase to encompass a broader reorientation of supply relationships. The refiner last month purchased its first Colombian oil under an optional supply deal with state oil company Ecopetrol and for the first time bought Ecuadorean Oriente crude, demonstrating willingness to explore previously untapped sourcing options across Latin America.

Other Indian refiners have joined this diversification push. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited has awarded tenders to buy Iraqi and Omani crude on the spot market, while the company announced plans to sign a $780 million oil supply deal with Petrobras during the India Energy Week 2026 forum in Goa. This agreement is expected to facilitate regular deliveries of Brazilian crude grades that can substitute for Russian supplies in Indian refining configurations.

The shift toward non-Russian sources has also driven increased purchases from the United States itself. In October 2025, India’s crude oil imports from the United States reached the highest level since March 2021, with volumes climbing to 575,000 barrels daily by January 2026—the highest since 2022. This surge was primarily driven by three factors: the bilateral trade target of $500 billion under “Mission 500,” the need for a diplomatic response to high reciprocal tariffs, and efforts to avert the threat of secondary sanctions on Indian refineries.

However, analysts caution that rising American crude imports do not necessarily indicate a permanent reduction in Indian dependency on Russian oil. Some Indian refiners have demonstrated remarkable agility in navigating the sanctions landscape, switching from Rosneft and Lukoil to non-sanctioned Russian oil companies as suppliers. Nayara Energy, which operates India’s second-largest refinery in Vadinar, Gujarat, and in which Rosneft owns a 49.13 percent stake, is expected to continue importing from sanctioned entities given its ownership structure.

Strategic Implications for India’s Energy Security

The pivot away from Russian crude presents both opportunities and challenges for India’s energy security framework. On one hand, geographic diversification reduces concentration risk and strengthens relationships with multiple suppliers across different regions, creating resilience against supply disruptions from any single source. The cultivation of supply relationships with Angola, Brazil, the UAE, and potentially new sources like Colombia and Ecuador provides Indian refiners with greater flexibility and negotiating leverage.

On the other hand, the loss of Russian discounts means higher import costs at a time when India’s crude consumption continues to grow. India is the world’s third-largest consumer of crude oil after the United States and China, with consumption rising to 265.7 million metric tonnes in 2025, growing at a rate of 3.7 percent annually. Limited domestic production capability forces India to import around 89 percent of its needs, making affordable crude acquisition central to managing inflation and supporting economic growth.

The higher costs associated with diversified sourcing have already begun affecting Indian refiners’ economics. The switch is affecting run rates, with Russian crude having been available at significant discounts that supported both refining margins and competitive positioning in global refined product markets. The average price for imported crude has inched higher by $5 per barrel over the Dubai benchmark this fiscal year, squeezing margins and potentially forcing refiners to pass costs through to consumers or accept lower profitability.

There are also potential complications with European markets. Under the “import ban on refined products obtained from Russian crude oil” announced in October 2025 EU compliance guidelines, in effect from January 2026, India’s exports of petroleum products to the European Union may potentially decline. Between 2018 and 2024, India’s exports of petroleum products to the EU increased substantially as Indian refiners processed Russian crude and sold refined products to European buyers—an arrangement that provided lucrative arbitrage opportunities but may now face regulatory obstacles.

The Geopolitical Balancing Act

India’s crude sourcing decisions reflect broader tensions in its foreign policy orientation. New Delhi has long emphasized strategic autonomy, maintaining relationships across multiple power centers and refusing to align exclusively with any single bloc. This approach served India well during the Cold War and has been revived in recent years as India participates in forums like BRICS while simultaneously deepening security cooperation with the United States through the Quad and other mechanisms.

The current energy dilemma tests these principles. Purchasing Russian crude at favorable prices made economic sense and aligned with India’s stated commitment to energy security for its 1.4 billion citizens. Indian officials have argued that unlike Western nations that can afford to prioritize geopolitical considerations over economic interests, India faces the practical challenge of keeping fuel affordable for a population where millions still live in poverty.

Furthermore, New Delhi has pointed out what it views as double standards in Western criticism. While the United States and European Union condemned India’s Russian oil purchases, Western countries continued importing Russian goods including uranium, palladium, fertilizers, and substantial volumes of Russian liquefied natural gas. In 2025 alone, Russia’s Yamal LNG project earned billions of euros from European buyers, highlighting what Indian observers characterize as hypocrisy in Western energy policy.

The Indian government has also noted inconsistency in American messaging. In November 2022, then-Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen indicated the US had no objection to India buying Russian oil outside the G7 price cap if Western services were not used. In February 2024, Assistant Secretary of State Geoffrey Pyatt acknowledged India’s role in stabilizing global energy markets, and later that year, Ambassador Eric Garcetti described India’s imports as aligned with US policy objectives.

However, the Trump administration has taken a markedly different stance, viewing India’s Russian energy ties as unacceptable and worthy of harsh economic punishment. This shift has forced New Delhi into difficult choices about balancing economic interests, energy security, diplomatic relationships, and geopolitical positioning.

Angola’s Growing Role in Asian Crude Markets

For Angola, increased Indian demand represents an opportunity to strengthen its position in Asian markets at a time when the country seeks to stabilize and eventually grow its oil production. Angola’s crude production has declined from a peak of around 2 million bpd in 2008 to approximately 1.03 million bpd in early 2025, reflecting natural decline in mature fields and underinvestment during years of low oil prices.

The country offers multiple crude grades with varying specifications. Beyond Hungo and Clove, Angola produces Cabinda Blend (32.0° API and 0.12 percent sulfur), Girassol (30.8° API and 0.34 percent sulfur), Dalia (23.65° API and 0.49 percent sulfur), and several others. The quality of Angolan crude is generally good, with low sulfur content that commands premium pricing in Asian markets where refiners face increasingly stringent emissions regulations.

Angola’s strategic location off the southwestern coast of Africa provides logistical advantages for serving Asian markets, with shipping routes to India more direct than from many Middle Eastern suppliers. The country’s membership in OPEC+ and participation in production management agreements provides some price stability, though Angola has at times struggled to meet its quotas due to technical and financial constraints in its mature production base.

The Angolan government has been working to reverse production declines through regulatory reforms and new investment attraction. The National Agency for Petroleum, Gas and Biofuels, which took over concessionaire rights from national oil company Sonangol in 2019, has pursued licensing rounds aimed at bringing new acreage into development. However, success in reversing the production decline will depend on sustained investment in both brownfield optimization of mature assets and exploration and development of new discoveries.

Looking Ahead: Durability of the Diversification Strategy

The critical question facing Indian policymakers and energy executives is whether the current diversification away from Russian crude represents a tactical adjustment or a strategic transformation. Much depends on the evolution of several key variables: the trajectory of US-India trade negotiations, the durability of sanctions on Russian energy companies, the availability of alternative supplies at acceptable prices, and broader geopolitical developments including the trajectory of the Ukraine conflict and India’s relationships with both Washington and Moscow.

If Washington and New Delhi successfully conclude a comprehensive trade agreement that includes meaningful tariff reductions, Indian refiners may find themselves locked into diversified sourcing patterns that become the new normal. The relationships being built with suppliers like Angola, Brazil, Colombia, and Ecuador could mature into long-term supply arrangements that reduce the temptation to revert to Russian barrels even if sanctions were relaxed.

Conversely, if trade negotiations stall or fail to deliver the expected benefits, or if crude prices spike due to supply disruptions in the Middle East or elsewhere, the economic logic of resuming Russian purchases at steep discounts could reassert itself. Some Indian refiners have already demonstrated that sanctions can be navigated through creative sourcing from non-sanctioned Russian entities, suggesting that the infrastructure and expertise for Russian crude procurement remains intact even as volumes have declined.

The European dimension adds further complexity. If EU enforcement of its ban on refined products derived from Russian crude proves rigorous, Indian refiners may face a stark choice between processing Russian crude for domestic consumption only or maintaining their lucrative European export markets. This could force additional recalibration of refining economics and crude sourcing strategies.

For now, Indian Oil Corporation’s 7 million barrel purchase from Angola, Brazil, and the UAE demonstrates both the company’s capacity to rapidly diversify its supply base and the tangible impact of American economic pressure on Indian energy policy. Whether this represents the beginning of a permanent restructuring of India’s crude import architecture or a temporary accommodation to diplomatic exigencies remains an open question—one that will be answered not by any single transaction but by the cumulative pattern of decisions made by Indian refiners, policymakers, and their international counterparts over the coming months and years.

Ready to take your career to the next level? Join our Online courses: ACCA, HESI A2, ATI TEAS 7 , HESI EXIT  , NCLEX – RN and NCLEX – PN, Financial Literacy!🌟 Dive into a world of opportunities and empower yourself for success. Explore more at Serrari Ed and start your exciting journey today! 

Track GDP, Inflation and Central Bank rates for top African markets with Serrari’s comparator tool.

See today’s Treasury bonds and Money market funds movement across financial service providers in Kenya, using Serrari’s comparator tools.

photo source: Google

By: Montel Kamau

Serrari Financial Analyst

26th January, 2026

Share this article:
Article, Financial and News Disclaimer

The Value of a Financial Advisor
While this article offers valuable insights, it is essential to recognize that personal finance can be highly complex and unique to each individual. A financial advisor provides professional expertise and personalized guidance to help you make well-informed decisions tailored to your specific circumstances and goals.

Beyond offering knowledge, a financial advisor serves as a trusted partner to help you stay disciplined, avoid common pitfalls, and remain focused on your long-term objectives. Their perspective and experience can complement your own efforts, enhancing your financial well-being and ensuring a more confident approach to managing your finances.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Readers are encouraged to consult a licensed financial advisor to obtain guidance specific to their financial situation.

Article and News Disclaimer

The information provided on www.serrarigroup.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to keep the information up to date and accurate, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

www.serrarigroup.com is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information on the website is provided on an as-is basis, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness, or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose.

In no event will www.serrarigroup.com be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information provided on the website or for any consequential, special, or similar damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

The articles, news, and information presented on www.serrarigroup.com reflect the opinions of the respective authors and contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the website or its management. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the individual authors and do not represent the website's views or opinions as a whole.

The content on www.serrarigroup.com may include links to external websites, which are provided for convenience and informational purposes only. We have no control over the nature, content, and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorsement of the views expressed within them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, www.serrarigroup.com takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control.

Please note that laws, regulations, and information can change rapidly, and we advise you to conduct further research and seek professional advice when necessary.

By using www.serrarigroup.com, you agree to this disclaimer and its terms. If you do not agree with this disclaimer, please do not use the website.

www.serrarigroup.com, reserves the right to update, modify, or remove any part of this disclaimer without prior notice. It is your responsibility to review this disclaimer periodically for changes.

Serrari Group 2025