Serrari Group

Kenya Raises Mandatory Reinsurance Cessions to State-Owned Kenya Re from 20% to 25% in Policy Shift

The Kenyan government has announced plans to significantly increase the mandatory proportion of insurance business that private insurers must cede to the state-controlled Kenya Reinsurance Corporation (Kenya Re), raising the requirement from the current 20% to 25% under new draft regulations set to take effect on January 1, 2026. This policy shift, unveiled through the draft Insurance (Amendment) Regulations 2025, represents a substantial intervention in the country’s insurance market structure and signals the government’s determination to strengthen domestic reinsurance capacity while potentially enhancing revenue flows to a strategic state-owned enterprise.

Build the future you deserve. Get started with our top-tier Online courses: ACCA, HESI A2, ATI TEAS 7, HESI EXIT, NCLEX-RN, NCLEX-PN, and Financial Literacy. Let Serrari Ed guide your path to success. Enroll today.

Official Announcement and Implementation Timeline

The proposed regulatory changes were formally communicated by Insurance Regulatory Authority (IRA) Chief Executive Officer Godfrey Kiptum through an official notice to industry stakeholders. In his statement, Kiptum emphasized both the scope and permanence of the proposed amendments: “The proposed amendments are intended to take effect on 1 January 2026 to apply to all treaty reinsurance contracts entered for the year 2026 and for subsequent years, until the Corporation is privatised.”

This explicit reference to Kenya Re’s eventual privatization provides important context for understanding the amendment’s intended lifespan. While the increased cession requirement will become permanent in regulatory terms—eliminating the current practice of annual renewals—it will theoretically expire once the government proceeds with privatizing its controlling stake in Kenya Re. However, given that privatization discussions have occurred periodically over many years without culminating in actual divestment, the practical effect may be an indefinite extension of the 25% mandatory cession requirement.

The January 1, 2026 effective date provides insurers with approximately three months from the regulation’s finalization to adjust their reinsurance programs, renegotiate treaty arrangements, and ensure compliance with the new requirements. This transition period, while relatively brief, should be sufficient for most insurers given that annual reinsurance treaty renewals typically occur during the fourth quarter in preparation for January 1 effective dates that align with calendar year policy periods.

Understanding Mandatory Cessions in Reinsurance

To appreciate the significance and implications of the proposed regulatory change, it is essential to understand what mandatory cessions represent in the context of insurance and reinsurance markets. Reinsurance, often described as “insurance for insurance companies,” involves insurers transferring portions of their risk portfolios to reinsurance companies to protect against catastrophic losses, smooth earnings volatility, and manage capital requirements.

Insurance companies typically structure their reinsurance programs through two primary mechanisms: treaty reinsurance and facultative reinsurance. Treaty reinsurance involves standing agreements where the reinsurer automatically accepts specified percentages or layers of risks written by the insurer across defined classes of business. Facultative reinsurance, by contrast, involves case-by-case negotiations for individual large or unusual risks.

A “cession” in reinsurance terminology refers to the portion of risk—and corresponding premium—that an insurer transfers to a reinsurer. When governments mandate minimum cession percentages to state-owned reinsurers, they are essentially requiring private insurers to allocate specified portions of their business to government-controlled entities regardless of commercial considerations like pricing competitiveness, claims-paying capacity, or service quality.

Many countries, particularly in developing markets, have implemented mandatory cession requirements to support domestic reinsurance industries, retain capital within national economies, and build local capacity in sophisticated reinsurance operations. However, such requirements remain controversial, with critics arguing they distort market competition, potentially increase costs if mandated reinsurers lack efficiency, and may conflict with international trade agreements and insurance regulatory best practices that emphasize open, competitive markets.

Policy Rationale: Strengthening Domestic Capacity

The National Treasury, which proposed the changes through the draft Insurance (Amendment) Regulations 2025, has articulated several objectives justifying the increased mandatory cession requirement. The primary stated rationale centers on strengthening domestic reinsurance capacity and deepening market development in Kenya’s insurance sector.

Building National Reinsurance Capacity

From the government’s perspective, requiring higher cessions to Kenya Re serves multiple strategic purposes related to building and maintaining domestic reinsurance expertise and capabilities. By guaranteeing Kenya Re a larger share of the national insurance market’s reinsurance placements, the government ensures the state-owned reinsurer maintains sufficient premium volume to:

Attract and Retain Talent: A larger book of business enables Kenya Re to justify higher compensation for skilled reinsurance professionals—actuaries, underwriters, claims specialists, and risk managers—whose expertise is essential for sophisticated reinsurance operations. Without adequate premium volume, retaining top talent becomes challenging as professionals migrate to larger international reinsurers or other financial services sectors.

Invest in Infrastructure and Technology: Modern reinsurance operations require substantial investments in actuarial modeling software, data analytics capabilities, risk assessment tools, and information systems. Larger premium volumes generate the revenue necessary to fund these technology investments that enhance underwriting accuracy and operational efficiency.

Develop Specialized Expertise: Reinsurance of complex risks—such as aviation, marine cargo, engineering projects, or cyber insurance—requires deep technical knowledge. Guaranteed market share provides Kenya Re with exposure to diverse risks that build institutional expertise across multiple lines of business.

Maintain Financial Strength: Larger premium volumes, assuming adequate underwriting discipline, should translate into greater capital accumulation through retained earnings, enhancing Kenya Re’s financial strength ratings and capacity to assume larger individual risks or provide higher treaty capacity to ceding insurers.

Mobilizing National Investment Funds

IRA CEO Kiptum specifically cited the objective of mobilizing national investment funds as a rationale for the increased mandatory cessions. This references the broader economic benefits that flow from retaining reinsurance premiums within Kenya rather than transferring them to international reinsurers based in London, Zurich, Munich, or other global reinsurance centers.

When Kenyan insurers cede business to international reinsurers, the premiums flow out of the country while reinsurance claims payments flow back in only when insured losses occur. The net effect is often a substantial outflow of capital, as reinsurers price their products to generate underwriting profits over time. By mandating higher cessions to Kenya Re, the government ensures that more premium income remains in Kenya, where it can be invested in government securities, corporate bonds, real estate, and other domestic assets.

Kenya Re’s investment portfolio, which holds reinsurance reserves and capital in various asset classes, contributes to domestic capital formation and potentially supports government financing needs if significant portions are invested in Treasury bonds and bills. The dividends that Kenya Re pays to the government also represent a fiscal benefit, effectively creating a revenue stream that supplements tax collection.

Deepening Market Development

The government’s stated objective of deepening market development reflects a view that a strong domestic reinsurance industry contributes to overall insurance market growth and sophistication. A well-capitalized local reinsurer can provide competitive capacity for risks that might otherwise be difficult or expensive to place in international markets, potentially lowering costs for insurers and ultimately for insurance consumers.

Additionally, a strong Kenya Re can serve as a capacity provider and partner for smaller Kenyan insurers that might struggle to access international reinsurance markets on favorable terms due to their limited track records or small premium volumes. By providing accessible reinsurance capacity, Kenya Re may indirectly support competition and market entry by reducing barriers that small insurers face in securing adequate reinsurance protection.

Making Cessions Permanent Rather Than Annual

A significant aspect of the proposed regulatory change involves making the mandatory cession requirement a permanent feature of Kenya’s insurance regulatory framework rather than a temporary measure requiring annual renewal. Under the current regime, the 20% cession requirement must be renewed each year, creating some uncertainty for both insurers and Kenya Re about the long-term regulatory environment.

By embedding the 25% requirement permanently in regulations (subject only to Kenya Re’s eventual privatization), the government provides greater certainty and stability for multi-year planning by all market participants. Insurers can structure their reinsurance programs with confidence that the mandatory cession requirement will remain stable, while Kenya Re can make longer-term business and investment decisions based on predictable market share guarantees.

However, this permanence also removes flexibility to adjust the requirement in response to changing market conditions, Kenya Re’s performance, or evolving views about the appropriate role of mandatory cessions in a modern insurance market. Critics might argue that regular renewal requirements provided useful opportunities to reassess whether mandatory cessions remain justified and appropriately calibrated, whereas permanent regulations could become entrenched even if circumstances change.

One decision can change your entire career. Take that step with our Online courses in ACCA, HESI A2, ATI TEAS 7, HESI EXIT, NCLEX-RN, NCLEX-PN, and Financial Literacy. Join Serrari Ed and start building your brighter future today.

Application Across Insurance Classes

The draft regulations specify that the increased 25% mandatory cession will apply to both general insurance and long-term insurance classes, ensuring comprehensive coverage across Kenya’s entire insurance industry. This dual application has important implications given the different characteristics and risk profiles of these two broad insurance categories.

General Insurance Classes

General insurance (also called non-life or property-casualty insurance) encompasses diverse coverage types including motor vehicle insurance, property insurance for homes and commercial buildings, liability insurance, marine cargo insurance, aviation insurance, engineering insurance for construction projects, and various commercial lines. These insurance classes typically involve shorter policy periods (often one year) and more immediate claims settlement patterns compared to long-term insurance.

For general insurance, the 25% mandatory cession means that Kenya Re will automatically receive at least one-quarter of the premium income from these diverse lines of business, providing the reinsurer with broad exposure to the full spectrum of non-life insurance risks written in Kenya. This diversification can help balance Kenya Re’s portfolio, as profitable lines like fire insurance or marine cargo may offset less profitable classes like motor insurance that often experiences challenging loss ratios.

Long-Term Insurance Classes

Long-term insurance primarily encompasses life insurance products including term life, whole life, endowment policies, annuities, and increasingly popular investment-linked products that combine insurance protection with savings or investment components. These products involve extended policy durations—often 10, 20, or 30 years—and claims patterns that differ significantly from general insurance.

Applying the 25% mandatory cession to long-term insurance ensures Kenya Re participates in this growing segment of Kenya’s insurance market. Life insurance has experienced strong growth in Kenya driven by rising incomes, increasing financial awareness, expansion of bancassurance distribution through bank branches, and regulatory initiatives promoting insurance penetration. Kenya Re’s increased participation in life reinsurance could provide important capacity for mortality risk, longevity risk in annuity products, and morbidity risk in health insurance products that are increasingly significant in the market.

Government Ownership and Dividend Implications

A crucial context for understanding the mandatory cession increase involves Kenya Re’s ownership structure and the fiscal implications for government finances. The Kenyan government holds a 60% controlling ownership stake in Kenya Re, making the reinsurer effectively a state-owned enterprise whose financial performance directly impacts government revenues through dividend payments.

The National Treasury has explicitly indicated that the higher mandatory cession rate should improve Kenya Re’s dividend capacity over time, creating a direct fiscal benefit as increased premium income translates into higher profits (assuming adequate underwriting discipline) and consequently larger dividend distributions to shareholders. With 60% government ownership, the majority of any dividend increase flows directly to the National Treasury, providing a revenue source that can help fund government operations or reduce borrowing requirements.

This ownership structure creates an inherent conflict of interest in regulatory policy-making. As both the majority shareholder of Kenya Re and the authority overseeing insurance regulation (through the IRA), the government faces tensions between its commercial interests in maximizing Kenya Re’s profitability and its regulatory responsibilities to ensure fair, competitive insurance markets that serve consumer interests.

Critics of mandatory cession requirements often highlight this conflict, arguing that government-mandated market share allocations to state-owned enterprises represent a form of regulatory capture where commercial interests override sound regulatory principles. Defenders counter that government ownership of strategic enterprises can serve legitimate policy objectives including ensuring service provision in underserved markets, maintaining national capacity in critical sectors, and generating revenue to fund public services.

Market Competition and Pricing Implications

The Treasury has sought to address concerns about reduced competition and potentially higher prices by emphasizing that 75% of reinsurance placement will remain open to market competition even after the mandatory cession increases to 25%. This means insurers retain substantial freedom to negotiate competitive reinsurance arrangements for three-quarters of their business, theoretically preserving market dynamics and competitive pricing pressures.

The government’s expectation of “little change in premium rates” rests on this continued competitive market for the majority of reinsurance placements. In theory, if Kenya Re’s pricing is uncompetitive for the mandated 25% cession, insurers might absorb the difference through efficiencies elsewhere or by negotiating particularly favorable terms for the 75% competitive placement.

However, industry observers note several factors that could complicate this optimistic scenario:

Cost Allocation: If Kenya Re’s pricing for the mandatory 25% cession exceeds market rates, insurers face a choice between absorbing the excess cost (reducing profitability) or passing it through to policyholders (increasing insurance premiums). While individual companies will make different decisions based on their competitive positioning and profitability, some pass-through to consumers seems likely if mandatory cessions prove meaningfully more expensive than market alternatives.

Market Signaling: International reinsurers might adjust their pricing for the competitive 75% of business in response to the mandatory cession requirement. If they perceive Kenya Re as receiving favorable regulatory treatment or guaranteed market share regardless of competitiveness, they might be less aggressive in pricing their own offerings, potentially reducing competitive pressure across the entire market.

Capital Efficiency: Mandatory cessions can affect insurers’ capital management strategies and their ability to optimize reinsurance programs for capital efficiency. Regulatory requirements to place business with specific reinsurers limit flexibility that might otherwise enable more efficient capital structures and risk management approaches.

Industry Consultation Process

The draft regulations have been subjected to a public consultation process, with stakeholders provided a two-week period to submit comments and feedback. This consultation period, which ends on October 15, 2025, represents an important opportunity for insurance industry associations, individual insurance companies, reinsurance brokers, consumer advocates, and other interested parties to provide input on the proposed changes.

The relatively compressed two-week consultation timeline reflects a balance between meaningful stakeholder engagement and the practical need to finalize regulations with sufficient lead time before the January 1, 2026 effective date. A longer consultation might have provided more thorough opportunity for analysis and response, but would have risked insufficient time for regulatory finalization, communication, and industry adaptation before implementation.

Likely Stakeholder Perspectives

Different stakeholder groups are expected to hold varying perspectives on the proposed mandatory cession increase:

Kenyan Insurance Companies: Primary insurers face the most direct impact from increased mandatory cessions. Larger, well-established insurers with strong international relationships and diversified reinsurance programs may be better positioned to absorb the change, while smaller insurers might face greater constraints. Some insurers may oppose the increase as constraining commercial freedom and potentially raising costs, while others might recognize political realities and accept the change as an unavoidable regulatory requirement.

International Reinsurers: Global reinsurance companies operating in Kenya will see their competitive position affected as the market share reserved for Kenya Re expands from 20% to 25%, correspondingly reducing the business available for competitive placement from 80% to 75%. Major international reinsurers like Munich Re, Swiss Re, and Hannover Re are likely to oppose the change through industry channels, though their influence on domestic Kenyan regulatory policy remains limited.

Reinsurance Brokers: Brokers who facilitate reinsurance placements between insurers and reinsurers face mixed implications. While the competitive portion shrinks from 80% to 75%, the absolute volume of business may continue growing as Kenya’s insurance market expands, potentially offsetting the regulatory constraint. Brokers’ perspectives will likely reflect their commercial relationships and the extent to which they handle Kenya Re placements versus purely international business.

Consumer Advocates: Organizations representing insurance consumers and the general public may focus on the pricing implications and the potential for reduced competition to harm consumer interests. However, if mandatory cessions successfully strengthen Kenya Re and contribute to a more stable, well-capitalized domestic reinsurance market, some consumer benefit might flow from enhanced market stability and availability of coverage.

Kenya Re Management: The immediate beneficiary of the proposed change, Kenya Re’s leadership undoubtedly supports the increased mandatory cession as it provides guaranteed market share growth and enhanced revenue visibility. The reinsurer’s management would be expected to argue that the change serves broader national interests in developing domestic capacity and retaining capital within Kenya.

Regional and International Context

Kenya’s mandatory cession requirements exist within a broader regional and international context where various countries have adopted differing approaches to supporting domestic reinsurance industries and managing capital flows out of national insurance markets.

Several African countries maintain mandatory cession requirements to state-owned or domestically-controlled reinsurers, though the specific percentages and structures vary significantly. Regional reinsurance organizations like African Reinsurance Corporation (Africa Re), PTA Reinsurance Company, and Continental Reinsurance also benefit in some markets from regulatory provisions encouraging or requiring participation by regional reinsurers.

International insurance regulatory standards developed by organizations like the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) generally emphasize principles of market openness, regulatory neutrality, and allowing insurers commercial freedom in structuring reinsurance programs based on price, capacity, security, and service considerations. Mandatory cession requirements, particularly those favoring state-owned enterprises, can potentially conflict with these international standards and may complicate Kenya’s participation in international regulatory coordination efforts.

Trade agreements and treaties governing financial services may also be implicated by mandatory cession requirements that discriminate in favor of domestic reinsurers over international competitors. While Kenya maintains sovereign authority over its insurance regulation, international trade commitments or regional economic integration initiatives could create tensions with preferential treatment for state-owned enterprises.

Looking Ahead: Implementation and Adaptation

As the consultation period closes and regulations move toward finalization, Kenya’s insurance industry faces a period of adaptation to the new mandatory cession landscape. Insurers will need to restructure their reinsurance programs, potentially renegotiate existing arrangements, and ensure compliance systems accurately track and report the required 25% Kenya Re cessions.

For Kenya Re, the increased mandatory market share provides both opportunity and challenge. The guaranteed additional business should boost premium income and potentially enhance profitability, but will also require adequate capacity, skilled underwriting, and competitive pricing to demonstrate that the mandated business is being handled efficiently and adds value beyond simply serving as a government revenue mechanism.

The permanent nature of the new requirement, lasting until Kenya Re’s eventual privatization, creates long-term planning certainty but also removes flexibility to adjust in response to market evolution. Whether this permanence proves beneficial or problematic will likely depend on Kenya Re’s performance, the broader insurance market’s development trajectory, and evolving views about the appropriate balance between supporting domestic capacity and promoting open, competitive markets.

Conclusion: Balancing National Interests and Market Dynamics

The proposed increase in mandatory reinsurance cessions from 20% to 25% represents a significant policy intervention that prioritizes building domestic capacity and retaining capital within Kenya over allowing purely market-driven reinsurance placement decisions by private insurers. The government’s rationale emphasizing capacity building, capital retention, and enhanced dividends from its Kenya Re shareholding reflects legitimate national interests, even as questions remain about impacts on competition, pricing, and alignment with international regulatory best practices.

As Kenya’s insurance market continues developing and the country’s economy grows, the success or failure of this policy will ultimately be measured by whether Kenya Re uses its enhanced market position to deliver competitive, reliable reinsurance services that support overall market development, or whether the mandatory cessions become primarily a vehicle for government revenue extraction at the expense of market efficiency and competitiveness. The answer will emerge over coming years as the new regulatory regime takes effect and its practical implications become evident.

Ready to take your career to the next level? Join our Online courses: ACCA, HESI A2, ATI TEAS 7 , HESI EXIT  , NCLEX – RN and NCLEX – PN, Financial Literacy!🌟 Dive into a world of opportunities and empower yourself for success. Explore more at Serrari Ed and start your exciting journey today! 

Track GDP, Inflation and Central Bank rates for top African markets with Serrari’s comparator tool.

See today’s Treasury bonds and Money market funds movement across financial service providers in Kenya, using Serrari’s comparator tools.

Photo source: Google

By: Montel Kamau

Serrari Financial Analyst

16th October, 2025

Share this article:
Article, Financial and News Disclaimer

The Value of a Financial Advisor
While this article offers valuable insights, it is essential to recognize that personal finance can be highly complex and unique to each individual. A financial advisor provides professional expertise and personalized guidance to help you make well-informed decisions tailored to your specific circumstances and goals.

Beyond offering knowledge, a financial advisor serves as a trusted partner to help you stay disciplined, avoid common pitfalls, and remain focused on your long-term objectives. Their perspective and experience can complement your own efforts, enhancing your financial well-being and ensuring a more confident approach to managing your finances.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Readers are encouraged to consult a licensed financial advisor to obtain guidance specific to their financial situation.

Article and News Disclaimer

The information provided on www.serrarigroup.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to keep the information up to date and accurate, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

www.serrarigroup.com is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information on the website is provided on an as-is basis, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness, or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose.

In no event will www.serrarigroup.com be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information provided on the website or for any consequential, special, or similar damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

The articles, news, and information presented on www.serrarigroup.com reflect the opinions of the respective authors and contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the website or its management. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the individual authors and do not represent the website's views or opinions as a whole.

The content on www.serrarigroup.com may include links to external websites, which are provided for convenience and informational purposes only. We have no control over the nature, content, and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorsement of the views expressed within them.

Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, www.serrarigroup.com takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control.

Please note that laws, regulations, and information can change rapidly, and we advise you to conduct further research and seek professional advice when necessary.

By using www.serrarigroup.com, you agree to this disclaimer and its terms. If you do not agree with this disclaimer, please do not use the website.

www.serrarigroup.com, reserves the right to update, modify, or remove any part of this disclaimer without prior notice. It is your responsibility to review this disclaimer periodically for changes.

Serrari Group 2025